In Queensland, when a court convicts an offender, one important question arises: should a formal ‘criminal conviction’ be recorded against the individual? Very often, the court, has a discretion whether or not to record a conviction.
The decision is governed by section 12 of the Penalties and Sentences Act 1992 (Qld) (PSA), which provides the court with guidance and flexibility to consider the unique circumstances of each case before determining whether a conviction should be recorded.
Section 12 of the PSA sets out the framework for how courts decide whether to record a conviction.
Under section 12(1), a court may exercise its discretion to either record a conviction or decide not to record one. In other words, the court is not obliged to automatically record a conviction every time a person is found guilty.
Subsection (2) says the court must have regard to all the circumstances of the case, including (but not limited to):
These factors ensure that the decision is made with a view to both fairness and proportionality. For instance, a youthful first-time offender might be treated differently from someone with a significant criminal history.
In R v Brown [1994] 2 QD R 182; (1993) 68 A Crim R 367 at 193, Lee J said, by reference to the discretion conferred by s 12(2) of the PSA:
“The discretion is at large. The considerations are not limited to matters contained…s12(2). They are inclusive. There is nothing in the [Penalties and Sentences Act 1992] which requires more weight to be given to any one factor than the others. Relative weight depends on the circumstances of each case.”
This means there is no fixed formula when a court is considering whether or not to record a conviction. The court must assess the individual case before it: the seriousness of the offence, the person’s background, their prospects for rehabilitation, and the practical impact a recorded conviction would have on their life.
The PSA also sets out circumstances where a court must record a criminal conviction. In these cases, the discretion under section 12 does not apply, meaning that your lawyer cannot argue against the recording of a conviction, even if you would otherwise meet the section 12 criteria.
If the court imposes a sentence of imprisonment, whether that sentence is to be served immediately, suspended, or as an intensive correction order, the Act requires that a conviction be recorded. The court cannot make these orders without recording a conviction.
Whether or not a conviction is recorded can have lasting consequences. A recorded conviction forms part of an individual’s criminal history and may affect employment, travel, licensing, or other opportunities.
It is important to note that even if a conviction is not recorded, the person is still found guilty and sentenced, but the offence generally will not appear as a conviction on most criminal history checks (except in certain professional or occupational contexts). This can be critical for those trying to move forward after a single mistake.
Gilshenan & Luton are highly experienced criminal defence lawyers who regularly represent clients facing the risk of a conviction being recorded.
if you have been charged with a criminal matter and are concerned about a criminal conviction being recorded against you, you should contact Gilshenan & Luton for legal advice and assistance. We are available 24/7.
📞 07 3361 0222 (24/7)
This article is of a general nature and should not be relied upon as legal advice. If you require further information, advice or assistance for your specific circumstances, please contact Gilshenan & Luton, Criminal & Employment Lawyers Brisbane.