Applications for bail are usually required where the police have objected to a defendant being granted bail. The current COVID-19 pandemic has seen a change in the way Queensland courts (and indeed courts across the nation and internationally) are addressing bail applications.
The following recent cases provide an indication of how courts have, to date, dealt with the COVID-19 pandemic in terms of bail applications.
For most bail applications a Magistrate hears an application for bail. They can refuse bail and remand the defendant in custody; or grant bail and release the defendant from custody on certain conditions.
If unsuccessful, the bail application can be re-enlivened if there is a change of circumstances. Alternatively, a further application can be brought in the Supreme Court.
In Queensland, the Magistrates Court has been clear that it will continue to hear, and will place a priority on hearing, bail applications and applications to vary bail. See Practice Direction No. 3 of 2020.
Additionally, and relevant to Supreme Court bail applications, the courts are acutely aware of the infection risk and the pressure on Corrective Services involved in prisoners entering and leaving remand and correctional centres. See “Notice to legal practitioners in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic.”
Given the above, the general attitude of the courts recently has been to grant bail in circumstances where in the past a grant of bail may have been unlikely.
There have been a number of instances demonstrative of this in Queensland of late.
For example, an application for bail was granted to a defendant charged with terrorism-related offences which were alleged to have been committed in New South Wales.
Queensland’s Deputy Chief Magistrate found that the following exceptional circumstances existed in permitting the grant of bail:
A number of higher court decisions (so far, from interstate and overseas) have expressed approval and the desirability of bail being granted in light of the COVID-19 situation.
On 19 March 2020, the Victorian Supreme Court was the first superior court to acknowledge the impact of COVID-19 on defendants who are not granted bail.
In the matter of R v Broes  VSC 128, the applicant, Mr Broes, was charged with drug trafficking.
The court found the following factors relating to COVID-19 were exceptional circumstances to warrant a grant of bail:
The factors in Broes were also cited as reasons for granting bail in subsequent Victorian applications for bail.
These were also drug trafficking matters.
In New South Wales, the Supreme Court granted bail on 14 strict conditions, to a defendant charged with two serious domestic violence offences in Rakielbakhour v DPP  NSWSC 323.
The court said factual issues arising out of COVID-19 were relevant to a number of factors the court was to consider under the Bail Act (NSW).
These factors included:
The Supreme Court in the Australian Capital Territory in R v Stott (No 2)  ACTSC 62 found COVID-19 constituted a change of circumstances since the Applicant’s previous application for bail was made and refused in January 2020.
Bail was granted considering two main factors:
Overseas, similar attitudes have been expressed to the grant of bail during the COVID-19 pandemic.
The Supreme Court of Justice in Ontario, Canada in the matter of R v J.S., 2020 ONSC 1710 (20 March 2020) granted bail considering the following:
The courts' attitude to granting bail, confirmed in the cases described above, gives considerable scope for successful bail applications to be made where new charges are commenced and also where a defendant may have previously been unsuccessful in an earlier bail application.
If a family member or friend is in custody, contact us to discuss the prospects of bringing a bail application in light of the COVID-19 pandemic.
We continue to provide the best criminal law services during the coronavirus outbreak.
Our team is fully equipped to work remotely whilst still delivering high-quality legal services.
We are working closely with the courts and our colleagues to ensure services to all new and existing clients are delivered efficiently and with as little disruption as possible.
You can contact us by phone or email to arrange a telephone or videoconference consultation.
Phone: 07 3361 0222 (24/7)
This article is of a general nature and should not be relied upon as legal advice. If you require further information, advice or assistance for your specific circumstances, please contact Gilshenan & Luton, Criminal Lawyers Brisbane and Sunshine Coast, Queensland.