Updated 20 November 2024
Under the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (Qld) (WHS Act), an officer has a duty to exercise due diligence to ensure the person conducting a business or undertaking (PCBU) complies with its health and safety duties. This includes ensuring workers and other persons are protected from hazards and making sure the PCBU has suitable safe work systems in place.
Under the WHS Act, a company director or company secretary is an ‘officer’.
A person who makes decisions that affect the whole or a substantial part of a company’s activities or has the capacity to significantly affect its financial standing can also be deemed to be an officer (even without being formally engaged to undertake that role).
The due diligence duty is aimed at achieving and sustaining compliance by the PCBU, which requires the active involvement of its officers.
Section 27(5) of the WHS Act provides that due diligence involves an officer taking “reasonable steps”:
The above list is not exhaustive, and there may be other ways an officer can show they have exercised due diligence in the circumstances.
What is reasonable will depend on the particular circumstances, including the role and influence able to be exercised by the individual officer.
Compliance with the duty to exercise due diligence requires officers to take an active and inquisitive role in work health and safety.
What might constitute due diligence in one case may not hold true in another. This is because each situation and each workplace is unique and requires assessment on an individual basis.
There are, however, some general measures to comply with the WHS Act and demonstrate due diligence, including:
An officer does not have to do everything themselves. They may rely on information and specialist advice from others, and on the expertise of others. But reliance without exercising independent judgment is not enough to satisfy the duty.
To the extent to which an officer may rely on others, the officer must be able to demonstrate the reasonableness of that reliance, which may be demonstrated through the receipt of credible information and advice from appropriate people.
Penalties for breaching the due diligence duty are dependent on the category of the conduct associated with the breach. There are three categories under the WHS Act.
OFFENCE | MAXIMUM PENALTY |
Category 1 (section 31): Negligent or reckless conduct |
$600,000 fine or 5 years imprisonment |
Category 2 (section 32): failure to comply with duty – exposure to risk or death / serious injury |
$300,000 fine |
Category 3 (section 33): failure to comply with duty |
$100,000 fine |
Note: a breach of an officer’s duty is not a necessary element to prove the offence of industrial manslaughter |
*Penalties current as of November 2024.
If an officer fails to exercise due diligence, a penalty can be imposed on the officer as an individual. A penalty can be imposed on an officer irrespective of whether the PCBU is also convicted of an offence.
If you are a director or officer or believe that you may be deemed to be an officer, it is crucial that you take positive steps to fulfil your due diligence duty under the WHS Act. Directors must take a proactive approach towards work health and safety. One way this can be achieved is by obtaining advice from experienced WHS lawyers.
We have significant experience in advising and representing officers charged with serious offences under the WHS Act. Our strong technical knowledge of the WHS law and an intimate understanding of criminal procedure, enables us to provide clear and practical advice and robust representation.
📞 07 3361 0222 (24/7)
This article is of a general nature and should not be relied upon as legal advice. If you require further information, advice or assistance for your specific circumstances, please contact Gilshenan & Luton, Criminal & Employment Lawyers Brisbane and Sunshine Coast, Queensland.